• @nachtigall@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    31 year ago

    I did’t claim nuclear weapons being a solution for world peace. It is just that in the current state of the world, Russia would be the least to need “security guarantees” because no one would attack them anyway. You, however, make it appear I suggest to arm up anyone. But whatever, just keep twisting my words to fit your narrative ✌️

    • The article is about peace, granted world peace is a long way off but you eat an elephant one bite at a time, starting by ending current wars. Stating nukes equal security is what I don’t agree with at all and I was just trying to expand on your stance. All in all, it is not a logical approach at all to say if a country has nukes they can’t ask for some assurance they won’t be neede 🤷‍♂️

      • @pingveno@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        Oh no, Ukraine attacked infrastructure outside of Russia that is being used to attack Ukraine. I mean, I guess that Putin’s pride is wounded a little.

        • non-diegetic screams
          link
          fedilink
          41 year ago

          The Crimean bridge between Russia and Russian Crimea is outside of Russia?

          The previous poster said no one would attack Russia. Which is untrue.

          When y’all sign up, do they make you use your own account? Are you paid by the day or by the comment? It’s by the comment, right? You’ve got a whole Dickens thing going on.