Graphyte, a new company incubated by Bill Gates’s investment group Breakthrough Energy Ventures, announced Monday that it has created a method for turning bits of wood chips and rice hulls into low-cost, dehydrated chunks of plant matter. Those blocks of carbon-laden plant matter — which look a bit like shoe-box sized Lego blocks — can then be buried deep underground for hundreds of years.

  • silence7OPM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    8 months ago

    If you’ve ever been around a logging operation, you’d see how much (half?) of the plant matter extracted doesn’t make it into a logging truck, but is instead piled unto 3-story high heaps and then burned. Being able to sequester that material instead would be amazing

    • JoBo@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 months ago

      Sure. But turning it into building material would be even more amazing?

      • silence7OPM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 months ago

        Be nice, but we’re talking about remote locations with a high cost of transport. It’s unlikely to be cost-effective

        • JoBo@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          Even when it is bury for no value vs sell to replace carbon-producing materials? I don’t buy it. Very few places are so remote that there is zero local-ish demand for building materials and they have to build facilities and support workers in those remote places instead.

          • silence7OPM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            The older ones, sure. Mountaintop removal ones, probably not so much.

          • silence7OPM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            They’re proposing about 10 feet, which isn’t that far.

            • theluckyone@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              8 months ago

              Agreed. However, burying it ten foot underground in a remote location, sealing it to keep moisture out, and then continuing to monitor it for hundreds of years is not trivial.

    • Sonori@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      Typically i believe that it tends to be about twenty to forty percent of the tree by mass, but that’s still nearly doubling the about of carbon we sequester if we can sequester it.