An update here. Pavilion and CDCK (Discourse.org) are discussing building an ActivityPub plugin for Discourse. After some discussion, we’ve landed on the spec below. Any comments or suggestions welcome before we finalise it. Note that Support for incoming content (e.g. posts on Mastodon etc being imported into Discourse) is intentionally excluded. It will be possible to add this in a later version. Support for following users (as opposed to categories) is also intentionally excluded. It wo...
I agree. While the initial implementation proposal is hardly better than an RSS feed bot on Mastodon, it does lay the groundwork for true ActivityPub federation it seems. Discourse is a large complex software; Federation will not happen over night.
@poVoq I think it’s noticeably better than an RSS feed bot merely as described; it won’t require a bot polling, should have immediate delivery, and it will be manageable from within Discourse configuration.
Additionally, it looks like it would not be much work to extend it to support inReplyTo so that responses in Discourse show up as threads.
There’s been a lot of conversation on meta.discourse.org about how bidirectional federation could work reasonably within Discourse’s design eventually, and I think I’d be interested in that direction, but I’ll also note that Discourse can be configured to enhance searchability and at least on the instances I run, it is configured that way because being able to discover the information is the point. Anyone pushing for full bidirectional sync between the Fediverse and Discourse should keep this in mind before complaining about the lack of full bidirectional integration.
I agree. While the initial implementation proposal is hardly better than an RSS feed bot on Mastodon, it does lay the groundwork for true ActivityPub federation it seems. Discourse is a large complex software; Federation will not happen over night.
@poVoq I think it’s noticeably better than an RSS feed bot merely as described; it won’t require a bot polling, should have immediate delivery, and it will be manageable from within Discourse configuration.
Additionally, it looks like it would not be much work to extend it to support
inReplyToso that responses in Discourse show up as threads.There’s been a lot of conversation on meta.discourse.org about how bidirectional federation could work reasonably within Discourse’s design eventually, and I think I’d be interested in that direction, but I’ll also note that Discourse can be configured to enhance searchability and at least on the instances I run, it is configured that way because being able to discover the information is the point. Anyone pushing for full bidirectional sync between the Fediverse and Discourse should keep this in mind before complaining about the lack of full bidirectional integration.