I’m politically agnostic and have moved from a slightly conservative stance to a vastly more progressive stance (european). i still dont get the more niche things like tankies and anarchists at this point but I would like to, without spending 10 hours reading endless manifests (which do have merit, no doubt, but still).

Can someone explain to me why anarchy isnt the guy (or gal, or gang, or entity) with the bigger stick making the rules?

  • kriz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    Counter measures against warlordism would be crucial for effective anarchism for sure!

    I think the easiest approach to anarchism is searching for Chomsky talking about it.