• @silence7OPM
    link
    1517 days ago

    It doesn’t fully stop it — we still end up with ocean acidification and an altered pole-to-equator temperature gradient, with significant impacts on rainfall patterns.

    • @Mikufan@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      517 days ago

      With his version yes, but i personally think it would be more efficient to “just” deploy gigantic reflecting satellites that block the sun partially. This would be with way less risks, although higher initial investment it would probably be cheaper in the long run as well.

      Spraying particles in large scale into our atmosphere isn’t a good idea. Also because regulating the density of them is way harder than to send a signal to a satellite to do something differently.

      • @silence7OPM
        link
        817 days ago

        We can’t actually do that though, let alone keep it functional for the hundreds of thousands of years the earth will remain warmed by today’s CO2 emissions

        • @Mikufan@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          617 days ago

          We only need to keep it working for at most 200 years until we switched to carbon neutral and started reverting it.

          And actually satellites are pretty easy to maintain, especially outside our cloud of space junk. There is no rust and nothing that would break it, it however would need shielding against the EMPs our sun bombards us with from time to time.

          It would probably be necessary to build them in space, as such large structures can’t be shot into space directly. But we do have the technology necessary. We just need to start doing it.

          Its just one step of many.

            • @Mikufan@ani.social
              link
              fedilink
              417 days ago

              I said we have the technologies to do that and not that it’s easy. Also nobody said it has to be one fucking gigantic one, many “small” ones would do the same. And yes, i said we have to also get to a negative carbon output, within about 200 years that is possible. Its however way less problematic than to put gigantic amounts of rare chemicals (or pounders) into the air, wich would also cause problems with many idiots.

              • @silence7OPM
                link
                617 days ago

                Many small ones implies a huge and ongoing launch schedule.

                And no, if we do this, we’re not going to stop burning fossil fuels, or remove significant amounts of carbon — schemes like this mostly serve as propaganda for the fossil fuels industry to create continued permission to extract and burn.

                • Sonori
                  link
                  fedilink
                  217 days ago

                  How would many small ones imply a huge and oncoming launch schedule, especially if you are using an L1 array? It’s much easier to repair and refuel a field of cubesats already on site than to get them there in the first place after all.

                  Moreover, why would orbital shades and or mirrors mean that we keep buring fossil fuels? We would be near net zero before such an array would being anywhere near complete enough to compensate for anything, and more to the point such an array would not serve as continued permission for fossil fuel companies, as it does nothing to address the majority of ecological effects such as ocean acidification.

                  The whole point of such an array is to save tens of millions of lives which will otherwise be ended by the damage already done long before they were even born by blunting more violent storms and reversing sea level rise, not exactly a carbon offset.

                  • @silence7OPM
                    link
                    317 days ago

                    Because they’re going to fail and drift out of position over time.

                    Remember here: we don’t have any real history of maintaining stuff up there. It goes up, and is used until it fails, and then replaced. There are a couple exceptions in low earth orbit, but that’s it.

                • @Mikufan@ani.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  117 days ago

                  For a few years, yes.

                  And no, i don’t think so, but there is no hard facts we can argue about here, its possible that they would use that, but its not likely that it would work.