Oldie but goodie.

Transcript: Tweet by the SRSLY wrong podcast. Content: “message to my enemies: when the revolution comes you’re not just gonna get the wall, buddy, you’re gonna get four walls, a roof, clean clothes, good food, education, and quality health care because that’s what every human being alive deserves”

  • PrunebuttOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    The tolerance paradox doesn’t justify death squads.

    • Lumisal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I’m talking that such a revolution can’t be peaceful to happen because there exists powerful parties that are very interested in keeping the status quo who will NOT hesitate to use death squads to stop you from changing the status quo.

      Good luck convincing companies like Black Rock, that have both huge investments in housing properties and paramilitary, to just let everyone have free housing, or Nestle (who I hope I don’t even have to cover the atrocities they have and still do) to let people have free water, when the CEO has himself publicly stated he doesn’t think people are entitled to water.

      Also, never said death squads, but nice strawman.

      • PrunebuttOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        such a revolution can’t be peaceful to happen

        Never said anything about it not being peaceful. “Getting the wall” is an executional method. There’s a difference between enacting violence and executing people.

        Also, never said death squads, but nice strawman.

        What do you think “getting the wall” means? O.o

          • PrunebuttOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Like… nice deflection and if you don’t want to continue the argument, that’s fine, but… Is that it?

            All that contrarian shit and accusing me of strawmanning and all that and it ends with an insincere, sarcastic comment?

            • Lumisal@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              Yeah. After thinking about it, it’s not like the USA will ever have a revolution as much as a forced civil war, if it happens, and then violence would be inevitable.

              So arguing about a utopia that can’t peacefully happen is really redundant.

              • PrunebuttOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                Still not getting your point. Not sure you used “redundant” correctly here.

                You do know that there’s more that the US in the world, right?

                • Lumisal@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Yes, but considering most of the world at least has some form of nationalized healthcare already, including UK, Canada, and Australia, and the commentary is in English, it really narrows the likelihood that you and most others are talking about the USA.

                  I know it isn’t here in Finland you’re talking about at least.

                  • PrunebuttOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    3 months ago

                    Why would you think revolution is about nationalized healthcare?