• null
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Go ahead, share some examples then. Back yourself up. Should be simple if it’s so common.

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      You get one. I suspect you’re arguing in bad faith and I’m not going to waste more time on something like that.

      https://lemmy.world/comment/8972976

      Particularly sailingbythelee’s response. When you try to say this isn’t sufficient, it will confirm that you were arguing in bad faith the entire time.

      • OccamsTeapot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 months ago

        You could not have found a better example.

        Original position of the goalposts:

        No one is shouting down people for just saying Biden should stop supporting genocide.

        Now all of a sudden the downvotes are the most important part

      • null
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        3 months ago

        Oh the commenter who’s being downvoted? Yeah, it’s obviously not a prevalent or popular response. At best you’re complaining about trolls on the internet – that’s always going to exist.

        Oh, and before I forget, if you say that’s not what you’re doing, then it will confirm you were arguing in bad faith the entire time.

        That’s for teaching me that cool trick with that disclaimer – what a neat way to discredit people.

          • null
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            3 months ago

            So you were literally just pointing out that dumb people say dumb things and get down voted for it?

            Gee, how insightful.