TL;DR: Is there really a performance benefit to a gaming distro over a regular distro? Or is it more of a “this is the least work” to get setup?

——

I run EndeavourOS on my desktop and haven’t had any issues with performance. I just like playing with new things and learning from the experience.

I’ve seen loads of people recommending Bazzite as a gaming distro for various reasons. It’s gotten to the point that I installed it on a second SSD to do my own testing but I’d still like to see others perspective.

From my research, there doesn’t seem to be that much performance to be gained (generally speaking). I’ll be testing this on my own hardware but is this generally true?

I think a big draw (especially for new users) would be that these distros would require very minimal work to get up and running into a game.

I think the TL;DR at the top best describes my question. I’ve just been thinking about this and haven’t been sure how to express it in a clear manner for others to understand. Also, this video got me thinking more.

EDIT:

Glad to see that I’m not alone in my thinking. Biggest benefit of a “gaming distro” is the convenience of having everything setup and there is no real performance difference.

  • boredsquirrel
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 days ago

    What tests?

    Lightweight has many many things that might decrease performance, for example

    • bad multithreading
    • bad available RAM utilization
    • general under-supported and thus not supporting the latest stuff (like vsync)
    • not supported by Valve, which is likely a big thing

    But for sure having less bloat helps, but that is constant, while optimization helps relatively to the load.

    Light sway might have a smaller constant footprint, kwin a bigger one. But kwin might scale better.

    The software you run is often waaay bigger than the Desktop etc.

    • GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      20 days ago
      • bad multithreading: that means more cores are free for apps

      • Bad available RAM utilization: in my testing distros that used “free RAM is wasted RAM” philosophy were always slower than normal ones

      • less stuff = more performance and vsync is bad

      • BRUH what? What does Valve have to do with DEs? You definitely lost me there

      I get that you’re a Plasma lover but don’t say bad things about others DEs because of it. Also I am saying once again: go take a look at real life tests online if you don’t believe me. Word against a word doesn’t lead to anything except for a fight. And please stop trusting theories without trustworthy experimental proofs. That leads to trusting Big Tech or other scammy people/companies.

        • GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          20 days ago

          https://piped.video/watch?v=aHt8qIOMiTc

          I like this one. It’s quite new (so you don’t say that the situation has changed) and I think it explains quite well. I can’t give you many links because I don’t have much free online time anymore. I guess you can try to find more comparisons and real researches by yourself and I do apologize for the inconvenience

          • boredsquirrel
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            20 days ago

            Interesting channel, he also reacted to TheLinuxExp.

            Valve uses KDE, for Gaming. The so called “gaming” highly relies on Windows software translation stuff so I assumed it also has to do with optimized compositors.

            Lets see.