• Neon 🇺🇦🇪🇺🇹🇼🇮🇱 @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    can you also go after the rich Arabs who have Filipino slaves in their mansions in Europe

    maybe. If the Filipinos are in Switzerland. If there is a assumption of breach of basic human rights we can also go after them if the Filipinos are not in switzerland.

    But we would first need proof or at least reasonable suspicion that something is happening so we can start a investigation and get a search warrant.

    • uis@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Proof of suspicion in many jurysdictions is only needed for search warrant. There are things they can do without it. Like request from water company how much water is used when no people supposed to be there.

    • Blooper@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      Okay, but could maybe you just go after the rich? For boo other reason than being rich? Because, in my experience , rich people tend to suck and that seems reason enough to investigate. Please?

      Pls Switzerland?

      • Neon 🇺🇦🇪🇺🇹🇼🇮🇱 @lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        pretty sure that would be a massive breach of the Rechtsstaat(law state? rule-based state? constitutional state?) and even basic human rights.

        So no. Selective application of Rights is a really bad idea. That’s how you get fascism.

        • Peter1986C@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 days ago

          I think that rechtstaat/Rechtsstaat (both the German and Dutch variety of the word) are supposed to be translated into English as “rule of law”. But I could be wrong.