• hypertown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    I run 2 monitors with different DPIs and X11 works without an issue. Can’t say the same about wayland where scaling still has so many bugs it’s just unusable.

    • i_lost_my_bagel@seriously.iamincredibly.gay
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      You can’t set 2 different DPIs for the monitors on X11. On one monitor everything is just going to be bigger than the other. Depending on the DPI difference it can be basically unusable.

      • lutillian@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        You can configure software rescaling using xrandr and some scripts… But that can cause a massive amount of jank with anything that requires a degree of pixel accuracy

      • hypertown@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Valid point. I forgot about 4K… I run just 125% scale so it doesn’t bother me at all. Well it’s kinda funny that both protocols are broken in that regard.

        • Gamey@feddit.rocks
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          I feel like taht’s often the case but Wayland as the newer protocol usually has the correct architecture with a early implementation while X11 has hard to fix architectural problems. I am a opponend of “whatever works for you” and I think that will be Wayland for most people fairly soon if it isn’t already but in case it actually isn’t I wouldn’t recommend it because, well, it doesn’t work properly for you.