Archived page

    “Even after a judge required ACS to reunite Ms. Rivers with her baby, ACS continued to subject Ms. Rivers to needless court proceedings and a litany of conditions that interfered with her parenting of TW for months, while the unlawful removal of her baby was ratified by senior ACS leadership,” the complaint reads. “This was not because ACS was trying to protect TW; this was because Ms. Rivers is Black.”

    • AngryHumanoid@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      Do you think that’s some magic phrase you can parrot with absolutely no context? Let try an easy one: what human right did they violate? Are you referring to one of the 30 defined by the UN? If so which one? Are you using a different definition? If so cite your reference please.

      • halvo317@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        In no particular order

        All human beings are free and equal.
        No discrimination.
        Right to life.
        No torture and inhuman treatment.
        Same right to use law.
        Equal before the law.
        Right to be treated fair by the court.
        Innocent until proved guilty.
        Right to privacy.
        Human rights can’t be taken away.

        • AngryHumanoid@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          OK now cite specific actions listed in the article and which violation they match up to. You started by saying testing them for marijuana was a violation of human rights, maybe start by explaining that one.

                • AngryHumanoid@reddthat.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  I’m contrasting this conversation with the one I had with OP yesterday, where explaining the actions of the hospital from a position of how they and CPS operate shows why they did some of what they did and agreeing with the parts that the courts said we’re wrong, and we both came to a better understanding of why each other felt they way they did.

                  Then there’s you, who care more about buzzwords and stirring anger about “human rights” and absolutely no ability to back up your statements. You should have stayed on Reddit, you’d do better there.

                  • halvo317@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    You never even responded to the points in my first comment. Why would I dignify this conversation?