A jury has found a delivery driver not guilty in the shooting of a YouTube prankster who was following him around a mall food court earlier this year

  • El Barto@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    9 months ago

    Understood. I know that firearms can kill. Stabbing too.

    But not every use of a firearm is with the intent to kill. Someone could just shoot to a foot or a hand. Foolish? Sure. Intent to kill? Nah.

    • SheeEttin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 months ago

      Those are very small targets. They’d be hard enough to hit on a static range with no pressure. They’d be even harder to hit when moving, in a stressful situation, at close range. If you miss, you could hit someone else. Even if you hit them, the bullet will probably go right through and into whatever is beyond. This is why you aim for center of mass. Easier to hit, less chance of overpenetration, and more effective in stopping an attacker in a life-or-death situation.

      Despite what the movies may show, you can’t just shoot to wound. If you shoot someone in the leg, and hit the femoral artery, they can bleed to death in seconds: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17334183/

      • El Barto@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        9 months ago

        Those are just strawmen. It doesn’t matter if “those are small targets” or if “you can still hit an artery.” What matters in the persons’s intent.

        That’s like saying that “any person delivering a punch to someone else’s face intends to kill them because of the possibility of the punched falling down and cracking their skull open on the floor.”

        • SheeEttin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          Yeah, for fights that’s very possible. And in fact that would have been preferable if feasible in this scenario, because it’s still far less likely to be fatal than shooting someone.

          Proper use of a firearm is intending to kill someone. Again, there is no way to use a firearm to be less-lethal. If you shoot someone, you are shooting to kill. Presumably this guy had some CCW training and would know that.

          • El Barto@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            I disagree with you. Of course there is a way to use a firearm to be less lethal. Regardless, and again, no one was killed in this story, so…

            • jimbo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              9 months ago

              By dumb luck nobody died. The guy was shot in the chest, an area of the body known for being home to all kind of vital organs and arteries.

    • Dem Bosain@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      Nobody that’s ever used a gun is taught to shoot at the edge of the target. Aim center-mass or don’t even pull the weapon.

      • El Barto@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        Making a lot of assumptions here. What about people who use guns without that kind of training? Because those people exist, or else you wouldn’t see gun-related accidents being reported in the news.

        Regardless, and again, not the point. As there were no people killed here, and the shooter was acquited, so…