A jury has found a delivery driver not guilty in the shooting of a YouTube prankster who was following him around a mall food court earlier this year

  • merc@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    9 months ago

    I don’t think a shot in the abdomen counts as a “literal warning shot”. I think it’s more of just a shot shot.

        • Haziiieeeeeee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          23
          ·
          9 months ago

          Homeboy still ain’t dead is he? He was told to stop 3 times and kept doing his bullshit.

          I have no sympathy. Maybe fuck off when you’ve been asked to stop 3 times. Maybe the next person he tries this on will have better aim.

            • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              9 months ago

              Exactly.

              Also warning shots are stupid and dangerous.

              If you are in imminent enough danger to be discharging your firearm, It should be discharged into the danger.

              By firing warning shots, you are showing that you are not in imminent threat, because if you were, you wouldnt be wasting time shooting into the air or off to the side, both of which has a decent probability of ruining some innocent persons good day.

            • Breezy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              Whats the guy supposed to do, just shoot up in the air? Or maybe carefully aim and shot by his foot just enough threaten him? Or maybe just show the gun to this much bigger guy whos already harrassing him? Any of those situations could either result in a bystander getting hit, or the victim getting killed when his assualter pulls his own gun out.

              He did the right thing to protect himself. However he should not have been placed into this situation, all the fault should fall on the aggressor. But instead this victim is being held in jail and might be charged a felony for protecting himself from some deranged youtube asshole, WHO IS PROFITTING FROM THIS CRIME. The victim wouldve been better off if he had got a kill shot.

              • Serinus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                I think if the Youtuber dies, the jury convicts him. It shouldn’t be a factor, but you know it is.

              • SpiderShoeCult@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                9 months ago

                I know! He was supposed to go all Yosemite Sam on his ass and yell ‘dance, partner!’ while discharging his firearm at the assailant’s feet very quickly. Hillarity would have surely ensued! /s

              • merc@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                10
                ·
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                Whats the guy supposed to do

                Back away, run away, call 911, get a mall cop to help, throw a punch…

                Literally just about anything other than try to kill another guy.

                I mean you actually admitted it yourself without meaning to: “guy whos already harrassing him”. Harassing isn’t threatening. It’s annoying, but it doesn’t make you fear for your life. The other guy didn’t have a weapon, didn’t make physical contact, didn’t threaten him, he just aggressively harassed him. Nobody should die in that situation.

                • Breezy@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  Naw the victim was assualted, the jury already decided that. But thats besides the point. None of what you suggested is a viable option when you are face to face with a deranged person. We’re not going to see eye to eye, so i wont be resppnding even if ypu reply.

                  • merc@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    9 months ago

                    assualted

                    Assaulted.

                    besides the point

                    Beside the point.

                    resppnding

                    responding

                    ypu

                    you

                    None of what you suggested is a viable option when you are face to face with a deranged person

                    Of course it is. A possibly deranged person who isn’t violent, who hasn’t attacked, or even touched you. That’s no excuse to use lethal force. You’re not going to respond because you know you’ve lost the argument. When you admitted it was harassment you knew that it wasn’t suitable for killing, but you want to pretend that it is, because you like the idea of being able to kill someone who annoys you.