People are used to seeing stark warnings on tobacco products alerting them about the potentially deadly risks to health. Now a study suggests similar labelling on food could help them make wiser choices about not just their health, but the health of the planet.

The research, by academics at Durham University, found that warning labels including a graphic image – similar to those warning of impotence, heart disease or lung cancer on cigarette packets – could reduce selections of meals containing meat by 7-10%.

It is a change that could have a material impact on the future of the planet. According to a recent YouGov poll, 72% of the UK population classify themselves as meat-eaters. But the Climate Change Committee (CCC), which advises the government on its net zero goals, has said the UK needs to slash its meat consumption by 20% by 2030, and 50% by 2050, in order to meet them.

  • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    I didn’t want to mention the possibility that you’re ill-informed, missusing unapplicable or segment specific information and/or oversimplifying things

    there’s also the possibility you are doing this (even if you don’t know it)

    • Aceticon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Indeed.

      Which is why I explicitly mentioned my reference source and even pointed out things have changed in the meanwhile, and why in general I have tried to refrain from making absolutist “I know it all” statements.

      I’m well aware of not being a domain specialist.

        • Aceticon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Ponder on how your post with just “false dichotomy” and nothing else is going to be read by other people who are so far engaging your points in good faith and have been quite open about were what they’re saying comes from and how they might be wrong.

          Then ponder on what they will think about you from that point onwards and hence how they will engage you (if they care to engage you at all) after that specific response of yours in that specific style.

          Consider the possibility that the way other treat you reflects how you treat others.

          • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Ponder on how your post with just “false dichotomy” and nothing else is going to be read by other people

            Then ponder on what they will think about you

            … i’m good with it.

          • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Consider the possibility that the way other treat you reflects how you treat others.

            being confident (and right) is not being condescending.