Not really sure what to put here…I usually put relevant excerpts, but that got this post deleted for doing that

  • aidan@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    To prevent the reproduction of those who rely on murder. If a person had a genetic disorder where they needed a human heart transplant every year to live do you think they should get it? And even if they do, should they reproduce?

    • WldFyre@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      I didn’t realize transplants only came from killing people, your totally applicable and thoughtful analogy has me rethinking my life choices now.

      Here’s a thought experiment for you: if you were on an island, with only the vegan section of a grocery store to eat for survival, would you eat the vegan food?

      • aidan@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        I didn’t realize transplants only came from killing people,

        Can you explain your point a little more?

          • aidan@lemmy.worldM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            When did I say all transplants require killing someone? I said that a heart transplant required someone with a working heart to die. Just as a lion eating meat requires another animal to die.

            • WldFyre@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              Since lions aren’t moral agents (look this up if you’re unfamiliar with the term, it’s not only a vegan term) they don’t commit murder when they kill for food. Also, someone dying and donating an organ also isn’t murder.

              • aidan@lemmy.worldM
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                I didn’t say they committed murder. I said they rely on the death of others. Why should a species that must lead to the suffering of my others continue to persist if you can end it without harming the animal?

                • WldFyre@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Predators in the wild serve a purpose. Getting rid of all the predators would lead to even more suffering as the prey population would grow and lead to destruction of the environment/ecology, and then mass extinction of plant and animal life.

                  Vegans are still aware of the circle of life and nature’s cycles, we just point out that supermarkets and factory farming have nothing to do with either of those.