• TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    Chargers arent really an issue. Not sure why this is consistently the focus.

    Grid level battery storage is what we need. The cars can a day between charging. Charge them at home. But we effectively need to long term reduce the environmental impacts of electricity to 0. We need grid level storage to do so.

    I’ve been driving an electric for 3 years. I maybe charge outside of the house (slow, trickle charge overnight) 12x a year. Its just not neccessary.

    • silence7OPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Public chargers have two huge advantages:

      • They provide someplace for people living in rental housing to charge
      • They enable road trips

      The result of building them will be to shift some amount of transport away from burning fossil fuels.

      • lntl@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        by public, you mean like a gas station? a private business that serves the public

        or do you mean public like the interstate system is public? a public service funded by taxes

        • silence7OPM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          More like gas stations and toll roads. They’re not providing free-as-in-beer electricity

      • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        8 months ago

        These are both edge cases and shouldn’t be the focus of policy. Straight up. Its a complete mistake to prioritize these as investments.

        We have a grid, the VAST majority of electric car owners have access to outlets, we should be focusing on grid level storage, not charging networks.

      • lntl@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        this is true and it’s a fact that most people do just drive a bit and return home each day

        • p1mrx@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          When it comes to building DC chargers, the relevant question is “does anybody ever drive more than 100 miles from home in this area?”

          Even if 99% of your trips are near home, you still need DC chargers for the rest.

          • lntl@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Maybe I’m out of the loop! Figured they’d phase it in. Something like:

            • 1 transition fleets - buses, local delivery
            • 2 people commuting in town to and from work on the daily
            • 3 long haul interstate trucking

            When the plan is everyone gets 100% coverage, you’re absolutely right. We’ll need chargers every 50 miles

    • NovaPrime@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Having a broad charger system would facilitate commercial electric transport which is where the biggest gains can be made in terms of reducing car climate impact.