Nelson's Weblog: culture / apis-for-content-sites-must-be-free
readhacker.news
  • hyperhopper@lemmy.world
    5·
    1 year ago

    Ads, like Reddit does and reddit makes a ton of money. If they weren’t trying to make nft integrations or new TikTok and just had the staff it took to keep the lights on, it would be a stable successful business.

    But the greedy execs want more money so they act like they have no choice but to squeeze the users for everything they can. This is their choice, not a necessity.

    • joelthelion@lemmy.world
      2·
      1 year ago

      Exactly this. They keep repeating that they aren’t profitable. But the key question is: why do they need 2,000 employees? IIRC, before they were acquired by Facebook, Whatsapp managed to handle a billion+ users with 50 people.

    • ThreeHalflings@lemmy.world
      1·
      1 year ago

      If I write a third party app, then I can filter out any ads you pass me, or I can make it easy for a user to do at arm’s length from me by allowing plugins. This is exactly what’s happening with reddit third party apps.

      I don’t think it’s as black and white as you’re making out.

      • WindInTrees@lemmy.world
        1·
        1 year ago

        I would expect that not filtering ads (unless the user pays the content site) could be an enforceable stipulation to anyone using the APIs, no? I would also think that ads could be served through the common “get new posts” API in an opaque manner pretty easily.

      • deejay4am@lemmy.world
        1·
        1 year ago

        Well if you violate TOS then your API key gets revoked. If apps want access then they can play by the rules; I think that’s fair enough.

        Now, what’s fair when it comes to ad placement is a whole other can of worms…