• CJOtheReal@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Yes but there is always more salt being added naturally and artificially, if we take out water as well and leave the salt it will make it more salty over the years, shure, not from one year to the next, but over long therm it will be problematic.

    • poVoqOPMA
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      The water we take out also flows back into the ocean for the most part and currently a lot of non-salty water is entering the oceans from melting glaciers, so making the oceans too saltly is really the opposite of what is a problem right now.

      • CJOtheReal@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Wouldn’t it be more efficient to just keep the melting glacier water clean? (or frozen at best)

        And as said, its not a right now but a long therm problem wich we should fix before it even becomes a problem.

        • JacobCoffinWrites
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          That would be ideal but given how we keep slipping our climate goals, I think it’s worthwhile to have contingency plans to provide some societal stability. If you think we’re not devoting enough resources to combatting climate change, just wait till nations are focusing on fighting water wars and puting down riots. Having ways to provide people with clean water where they live (i.e. most, not near glaciers) isn’t just humane, it helps prevent environmental damage. Wars and their incredible destruction aside, we’re currently draining aquifers and rivers dry all over the place.

          Edit: also, if it does become a problem, removing the salt from seawater is easier than removing the water from seawater.