• GBU_28@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Alright Copernicus, clearly the suggestion that it was “impossible” related to the unacceptable nature of releasing all criminals without review.

    Agree that if you enforce childish semantic literalism then yes, I was wrong. But if you have at least two functioning neurons you’d understand quite clearly what was going on.

    Assuming you do, that means you intended to be petty, and have nothing to add.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Assuming you do, that means you intended to be petty, and have nothing to add.

      You get what you give, buddy.

      • GBU_28@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Refuting a nonsensical idea as impossible is not “being petty”. My short response at most was “being curt” or “dismissive”.

        You are too dumb to be in my life. See ya