petsoi@discuss.tchncs.de to Linux@lemmy.ml · edit-27 months agoBored With Bash? Change the Default Shell in Linuxitsfoss.comexternal-linkmessage-square34fedilinkarrow-up180arrow-down114
arrow-up166arrow-down1external-linkBored With Bash? Change the Default Shell in Linuxitsfoss.competsoi@discuss.tchncs.de to Linux@lemmy.ml · edit-27 months agomessage-square34fedilink
minus-squarenulllinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down4·7 months agoWhy does something have to be wrong with Bash for Fish to be better?
minus-squarepastermil@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·7 months agoBecause bash is an industry-wide defacto standard?
minus-squarepastermil@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·7 months agoA lot of people use it for work and they couldn’t have the slightest risk of their setup broken since their living depend on it?
minus-squareTheGrandNagus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·7 months agoI asked why others are better, I never called Bash shit. It stands to reason that if people want to switch to something else, then they must have advantages over Bash.
minus-squarenulllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·7 months ago what’s wrong with Bash in comparison to the others? The others have plenty of QoL features like auto-complete, spelling correction, syntax highlighting, etc. Doesn’t mean there’s anything “wrong” with Bash by comparison.
Why does something have to be wrong with Bash for Fish to be better?
Because bash is an industry-wide defacto standard?
And?
A lot of people use it for work and they couldn’t have the slightest risk of their setup broken since their living depend on it?
What does that have to do with the question?
I asked why others are better, I never called Bash shit.
It stands to reason that if people want to switch to something else, then they must have advantages over Bash.
The others have plenty of QoL features like auto-complete, spelling correction, syntax highlighting, etc.
Doesn’t mean there’s anything “wrong” with Bash by comparison.