• krashmo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    That’s not exactly true. Unless some battleground states remove him from the ballot it doesn’t matter what the states who were going to vote blue do. He wasn’t going to win there anyway. As a Colorado voter I would put us in that category. Trump’s not winning CO no matter what happens in this case.

    • Geobloke@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      Surely if the supreme court ruled that if he wasn’t eligible in one state then any single person in other states could use that ruling to have him removed from any state they live in?

      • krashmo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        That would depend on which interpretation of eligible we end up with. We might see a ban on removing him from ballots, individual states being left to decide, removal from all ballots, or some other other weird scenario. Nothing is straightforward with that man and I don’t expect this situation to turn out any different.

      • Ranvier@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        Based on what I read from discussions of the amendment passing at the time in the documents above, it sounds odd but it might be the case. Again IANAL, but they added a clause in the amendment that specifically says something to the effect of congress can make laws to enforce this. The idea being if they didn’t have that clause the power would be assumed to automatically devolve to the states, because of the part of the constitution that says any powers not delegated specifically to the federal government go to state governments. So basically there’s at least one interpretation here where unless congress makes a specific law enforcing the provision, it would be up to specific states to implement as they saw fit. I think it’s most likely the supreme court weasels out of this whole thing somehow still, but there might be a chance something like that could happen.

      • Natanael
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        It could end up with SCOTUS deciding states have the full right to decide what candidates they allow (has historical backing) but they would probably also need to argue that invalidation as a candidate in a minority of states doesn’t invalidate their power as an elected president, or else it gets very very complicated fast.