ylai@lemmy.ml to AI@lemmy.mlEnglish · 6 months agoCongress told AI firms should pay for copyrighted contentwww.theregister.comexternal-linkmessage-square33fedilinkarrow-up174arrow-down14
arrow-up170arrow-down1external-linkCongress told AI firms should pay for copyrighted contentwww.theregister.comylai@lemmy.ml to AI@lemmy.mlEnglish · 6 months agomessage-square33fedilink
minus-squareBlameThePeacock@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·6 months agoShould human programmers have to pay creators every time they look at code while they’re learning? I (and most people) have literally copy/pasted code from various websites into my own programs without any sort of payment or notice.
minus-squareMaestro@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up4·6 months agoIf you copy/pasted without any licensed then you’ve broken copyright yourself. It’s a good way to get into trouble in a professional setting.
minus-squareMaestro@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up3·6 months agoIt’s what BlameThePeacock admitted to doing.
minus-squareFaceDeer@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up3·6 months agoSure, but it has nothing to do with what AI does.
Should human programmers have to pay creators every time they look at code while they’re learning? I (and most people) have literally copy/pasted code from various websites into my own programs without any sort of payment or notice.
If you copy/pasted without any licensed then you’ve broken copyright yourself. It’s a good way to get into trouble in a professional setting.
That’s not what AI does, though.
It’s what BlameThePeacock admitted to doing.
Sure, but it has nothing to do with what AI does.