• aew360@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    94
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Steven Cheung, a spokesman for Mr. Trump, did not directly address Mr. Tacopina’s departure, saying only that Mr. Trump “has the most experienced, qualified, disciplined, and overall strongest legal team ever assembled”

    Oh yeah, his legal team is fucked

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    73
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    It was not clear why Mr. Tacopina decided to withdraw, and he declined to comment.

    Hahahaha! AhhhhhhhhHahahahahahaha! Does anyone think it’s NOT because Trump’s check bounced and he refused to pay what they agreed?

    • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      5 months ago

      More likely he realized that Donnie is likely to do something that will get him disbarred.

    • Telorand@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      5 months ago

      I think it’s because Joe thinks sanctions or worse are an imminent possibility, and he doesn’t want to throw away his career (any more than he has) on Trump’s bullshit.

    • Goku@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      5 months ago

      Probably because trump went off on a rant during closing arguments after his lawyers and the judge toldbhin not to.

      • phx@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yeah having a client who can’t keep his fucking mouth shut in the courtroom, and has their fan-club threaten members of the judicial, etc isn’t a great thing

    • Red_October@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 months ago

      It could also be because he has basic pattern recognition and saw how many of Trumps former lawyers are being convicted of serious crimes.

    • cosmicrookie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Based on the actual article it sounds like they disagreed in whether Trump should make the closing arguments.

  • Telorand@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    This is why Trump basically has multiple teams of freshman lawyers.

    The few experienced lawyers brave enough to take him on quickly find out that he’s a giant man-baby who’s unable to be controlled or reasoned with (or their hubris makes them think they are one who can), and the greenhorns are too naive to know it’s a trap and that they’re just fodder for the Trump Grift Machine.

    Either way, get fucked Joe. You should have left long ago and kept whatever shred of decency you used to have, instead of letting this rapist continue to abuse his victim.

    • silence7OP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I suspect it’s more about realizing that he won’t get paid than anything else. Plenty of lawyers willing to defend the guilty when they’re paid to do it

      • vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        38
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Plenty of lawyers willing to defend the guilty

        As they should.

        Justice can only be served when the defendant has had the opportunity to have a good defense.

        • Telorand@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Trump is definitely guilty, and I agree that he deserves a defense, but unfortunately for him, it kind of goes out the window when he doesn’t respect the laws and courts that give him that right.

          He has the right to a defense, not a good one, and that’s exactly what he’s getting because of his behavior.

          • vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            He has the right to a defense, not a good one, and that’s exactly what he’s getting because of his behavior.

            How about, he has a right to the best defense his ego will allow him to have?

          • BolexForSoup@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            The point is that it should never go out the window. It’s not “you must be this morally upright to receive your rights.” They’re rights. Much to my chagrin, he has them too. But I wouldn’t have it any other way.

      • zurohki@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        I suspect quite a few would represent a former president for free just to have that on their resume, it’s being disbarred or named in future lawsuits that’s the deal-breaker.

      • phx@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        When they think they have a chance to win, and even they can control their client

      • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        I think it’s more about Trump demanding to testify. If the lawyer knows you’re going to perjure yourself, the lawyer would get in trouble if it’s found out. Since trump has so many cases going on, someone would probably find out.

        Mr. Trump recently told The New York Times that he wanted to testify in the new trial, and that Mr. Tacopina had advised him against doing so in the first one — a decision the former president said he regretted.

  • dhork@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    I think Trump makes his lawyers miserable on purpose, and counts on them to leave now and then. One of his key tactics is delay. And asking for a delay because your old lawyer bailed on you and you have to bring on someone new is reasonable… Until it’s done one too many times.

    • The Pantser@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      They should be forced to disclose why they quit and if it’s because of non payment then the court should not allow them to delay they should proceed as scheduled.

    • DocMcStuffin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Tacopina declined to say why he was leaving. If he’s a competent lawyer then he’d require cash up front. My money is on Trump being stupid with his lawyers again, or he refused to add more funds to his account.

    • The Pantser@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      They really should be demanding payment up front. I have always had to pay up front when talk with a lawyer how is he not paying them?

      • Countess425@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        You only pay a certain amount up front. Once that amount is used up, they bill hourly sending invoices once or twice a month. When he doesn’t pay that, the attorney quits, and trump has to hire a new (sometimes team of) lawyer who needs time to get up to speed on the case and it can be a delaying tactic as much as lowlife-ness.

  • EnderLaw@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    5 months ago

    Any lawyer who represents Trump should have their head examined. He lies to them, blames them when the lies don’t work, and then stiffs them on the bill.   It’s just stupid to represent him. The really good lawyers already know this and decline representation. The ones who stupidly take his cases get what they deserve.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Mr. Tacopina also withdrew on Monday from another case in which he was still legally representing Mr. Trump: an appeal of the verdict in a lawsuit brought by the writer E. Jean Carroll.

    The trial in Manhattan, in which he is accused of falsifying business records to hide hush-money payments to a porn star during the 2016 election, could begin as early as March.

    He has represented high-profile clients ranging from the Fox News host Sean Hannity, who on his show called Mr. Tacopina one of the “greatest defense attorneys of all time,” to the former Yankees star Alex Rodriguez and the rapper A$AP Rocky.

    The withdrawals came a day before jury selection is set to begin in a second trial stemming from the allegations brought by Ms. Carroll, who accused Mr. Trump of raping her in a department store dressing room in the 1990s.

    Mr. Trump last week delivered part of his own closing remarks in the New York attorney general’s civil case, and was rebuked by the judge for going outside the confines of what he was allowed to talk about.

    Mr. Rodriguez, in a brief interview, said he could not speak to Mr. Tacopina’s involvement with Mr. Trump, but described his own experience being represented by him as he battled a suspension from Major League Baseball related to steroid use.


    The original article contains 767 words, the summary contains 223 words. Saved 71%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!