• givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    25
    ·
    5 months ago

    They stripped the state of their primary delegates…

    Because the state party wouldn’t violate state law…

    I get why you added the “somewhat” to that end but tho.

    And I don’t think any exchange with somone so anti-demacratic will ever be productive in a political sub.

    • donuts@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Yep, ya got me bro. Nothing says “i love democracy”, or as you call it “demacracy”, like advocating for a small state which is not at all representative of the broader voting base to unilaterally put itself first in line to the nomination process. 😂

      With people like you around it’s no wonder Socrates was put to death by popular vote. They also loved making shit up to get mad at back then.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Yeah, if it was a single person, I’d agree with you…

        But your “party member” is the state party leaders who have no control over state law…

        And the NH state government, their House is Republican, their state Senate is Republican, and their Governor is Republican…

        So what the fuck was the state Democratic party going to do about NH State law in less than a year?

        And why does them failing to do that mean no NH Dem gets a say in who their candidate is?

        Seriously.

        How does this work out that you think the state party had any say?