That was one of the more interesting SOTU addresses I’ve seen. Personally, I think he said most of the things that needed to be said, and he said them reasonably well. I’m sure he’s going to get some flack for attacking Trump directly (though not by name), but I was frankly glad to see it. Doing otherwise makes it seem like it’s just your typical election/political disagreements, but we’re past that now.

  • Hoomod@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 months ago

    Apparently that’s just how she is. She’s a lawyer, married to a retired football player

    If you watch her speech it’s disturbing

    • kromem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 months ago

      It was so creepily stepford wives-y.

      She did the Hannibal Lecter “not blinking” thing while alternating between smiles and rage that both never reached her eyes.

      Also, kind of ballsy to ask “are you better off than you were four years ago.”

      Like, yes, my life could be better, but I at least have toilet paper.

    • jaemo@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      Absolutely the least disturbing thing about that speech was the content, when it is contrasted with the delivery of said content. Supes creepy lady.