MonsiuerPatEBrown@reddthat.com to THE POLICE PROBLEM@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agoCalifornia Cop Who Shot 18-Year-Old Had His Bodycam Off, But Surveillance Footage Captured Him Shooting Suspect in the Back as He Fledwiredposts.comexternal-linkmessage-square193fedilinkarrow-up11.06Karrow-down111cross-posted to: usauthoritarianism@lemmy.world
arrow-up11.05Karrow-down1external-linkCalifornia Cop Who Shot 18-Year-Old Had His Bodycam Off, But Surveillance Footage Captured Him Shooting Suspect in the Back as He Fledwiredposts.comMonsiuerPatEBrown@reddthat.com to THE POLICE PROBLEM@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agomessage-square193fedilinkcross-posted to: usauthoritarianism@lemmy.world
minus-squareMastengwe@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down12·edit-23 months agoIn the same comment where you suggest people stop going by what if, you say: I will be honest, I don’t know the full extent of the situation yet You’re making a stance based on your admitted lack of information, and a single video that doesn’t show the whole story.
minus-squarehowrar@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down2·3 months ago“We don’t have enough information” is a perfectly valid stance to take when you lack information.
minus-squareassassin_aragorn@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·3 months agoIt should in fact be the default stance to take when lacking information.
In the same comment where you suggest people stop going by what if, you say:
You’re making a stance based on your admitted lack of information, and a single video that doesn’t show the whole story.
“We don’t have enough information” is a perfectly valid stance to take when you lack information.
It should in fact be the default stance to take when lacking information.