• archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    If Zionists consider themselves as the only true representatives of their ethnicity and thus separate themselves from the rest of their ethnicity, when someone else depicts that view, it is automatically anti-Semitic?

    Lol, you’re really doubling down on this? By your logic, does depicting a jew with a hooked nose classify as antisemitic? Since they say they’re the ‘true jews’, are any of the classic jewish stereotypes fair game?

    The problem with their use isn’t that you’re projecting a classification on them, it’s that you’re tying their differentiating characteristics to the terrible thing they’ve done. You’re making it (to varying degrees) about what makes them jewish, not the terrible thing they’re doing.

    I’ve heard a lot of rationalizations of racism before, but “i’m actually doing activism” is a new one.

        • lath@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          But the manner of speech in this case can be seen as a form of snobbish elitism that differentiates from the regular citizen.

          • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Lol ok so we’ve got one for ‘snobbish elitism’ and one for ‘idiotic’, anyone else with a contradictory description of this caption?

            weird hill to choose to die on there bud.

            • lath@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              All these different hills we have, yet somehow we all think ours is better.

              Enjoy your hill, random internet stranger.