Senator Tim Kaine, a former vice-presidential nominee and leading foreign policy voice in the Democratic party, has said Joe Biden now understands that Benjamin Netanyahu “played” him during the early months of the war in Gaza but “that ain’t going to happen any more”.

In an interview with the Guardian on Tuesday, Kaine accused the prime minister of making Israel “dramatically less safe” and hurting its longstanding relationship with the US, and said the US president had come to realise the limits of his influence.

The Democratic senator for Virginia is best known nationally as Hillary Clinton’s running mate in the 2016 presidential election, a race they lost to Republicans Donald Trump and Mike Pence. The Biden ally is a member of the Senate foreign relations and armed services committees.

MBFC
Archive

  • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Pretty clear saber rattling at Iran to make it known that any Iranian reaction to Israel’s illegal strike would be met with American force.

    Looks to me like hes trying to get Iran to not take the Israeli bait to create a larger conflict.

    Basically, using threats to prevent a larger regional war, no matter who started it, which is just good overall foriegn policy.

    • wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      Considering most vs Iran war games have grim outcomes for the USA, I don’t see that’s going to be effective.

      • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Are you seriously insinuating that the US is not a horrifically dominant military power compared to Iran? That US military threats are not taken seriously by despotic powers? Especially to non nuclear powers like Iran?

        • wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          I never said war would be easy for Iran. I’m saying to would be incredibly difficult for the US. Likely the most difficult war since Vietnam. This is a wildly known fact.

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Millennium_Challenge_2002

          And again in 2012 https://www.brookings.edu/articles/simulated-war-between-u-s-iran-has-grisly-end/

          Iran also probably still holds a grudge for the US (and indirectly Israel) backing Saddam during the Iraq-Iran war, I’m sure that they won’t think too too long about entering a war if the US’ saber rattling turns into action.

          • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            You realize youre linking 12 and 22 year old “war games,” right? That military tech and tactics have not been static for decades?

            One of those war games is 7 years older than smartphones and wasent even specifically about Iran. The other is a few dozen unamed “experts” who played fancy Risk at each other at a private think tank 12 years ago?

            Those are your sources that the modern US military is not a threat to Iran?

            • wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              3 months ago

              Clearly you know better than the military analysts of the US army themselves. I’m so sorry I shouldn’t have doubted an expert like you.

              You’re delusional.

              • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                A 22 yr old war game is your only auditable source for the comparable military power of 2 nation states, and youre sure it’s still accurate today?

                A wargame that took place right after Y2K, when people were talking about this new thing called the “information superhighway,” before social media existed, when the flip phone was king and a smart phone wasn’t even an idea, and yet its your gospel about modern military might.

                Sure thing.

                • wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 months ago

                  It’s convenient that you ignored that the experience was repeated ten years later with similar results isn’t it.

                  https://thehill.com/opinion/congress-blog/4339670-despite-washingtons-confidence-us-war-with-iran-would-be-disastrous/

                  Expecting an easy win against Iran is not any more of a strategy than waiting for humans to learn to fly. The means simply do not exist. Thus, one hopes that mutual deterrence continues to succeed and neither Washington nor Tehran decide to escalate.

                  Jordan Cohen is a policy analyst in Defense and Foreign Policy at the Cato Institute and holds a PhD in political science from George Mason University.

                  Up to you to provide sources that contradict this. So far all you have is hot air.

                  • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    3 months ago

                    Hey look at that, an actual source that isn’t 10 or 20 years old. Good job mate. It’s written by the Cato institute, a wildly biased right wing think tank funded by the Koch brothers, but it seems to have good numbers.

                    Yeah, Iran looks like a real motherfucker to conquer, but we sure as shit can do immense amounts of damage without that being the goal. That’s enough to give Iran pause, which is why Biden’s threats and rhetoric is effective.

        • demonsword@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          I wonder if it is in the US’ best interests being dragged on a war very much like the one waged on Afghanistan… a costly affair that ended up worsening the problem in the region

        • crusa187@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          Sorry bro, hypersonic missiles from Iran will blow the shit out of Hamptons estates, regardless of how much money we pour into the military industrial complex. We need to be de-escalating in the region, and stop Israel from further provocations.

          Also, threatening nuclear action after Israel was clearly the embassy bombing aggressor? You aren’t serious.