• Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Good share. I hadn’t even heard of the Nautilus expedition. Totally seems like a Wikipedia rabbit hole I would have already gone down.

    The biggest takeaway for me was learning the North Pole isn’t actually on land but rather sea ice. I had always assumed it was on a continental landmass.

  • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 months ago

    Did they expect the ice would be less than 20ft thick under the North Pole? I don’t see how they expected to be able to surface.

    • ProdigalFrogOPA
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      Purely speculating, but, they may have thought that the thickness varied even deep into the interior of the ice caps for some reason, hence why the guy doing the modifications to the sub wanted that light sensor to gauge thickness.