• Cegorach@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    11 months ago

    can’t function without cars entirely, we still need delivery vehicles etc.

    yeah, okay. But we need far fewer than we have. So producing them and shipping them around the globe needs to be reduced dramatically. So that point still kinda stands?

    And yes “this should have been made safer” is another point - but that doesnt invalidate the other.

    • Kempeth@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      So producing them and shipping them around the globe needs to be reduced dramatically. So that point still kinda stands?

      The supply side is the wrong place to tackle this problem though. If you limit the amount of new cars that may be produced, people will simply drive their older ones for longer.

      • HamBrick@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Driving an older car, and by extension not buying a newer car, decreases demand and would improve the amount of these cargo ships on the sea, thus lowering the opportunity for this to happen. I’m not sure if your comment was for or against people driving their older cars, but I think driving an older car is better than upgrading and buying a newer car

        • Kempeth@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          An older more polluting car migth not be the better option. But if the new car is one of those giant murde boxes then it’s not going to be an upgrade either.

      • deft@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        no infastructure needs to change. less roads more rails that simple. walkable cities and transit in between cities