• dsemy@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Yeah cause my favorite thing to do when programming is debugging someone else’s broken code.

    • Supervisor194@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I think where it shines is in helping you write code you’ve never written before. I never touched Swift before and I made a fully functional iOS app in a week. Also, even with stuff I have done before, I can say “write me a function that does x” and it will and it usually works.

      Like just yesterday I asked it to write me a function that would generate and serve up an .ics file based on a selected date and extrapolate the date of a recurring monthly meeting based on the day of the week picked and its position (1st week, 2nd week, etc) within the month and then make the .ics file reflect all that. I could have generated that code myself by hand but it would have probably taken me an hour or two. It did it in about five seconds and it worked perfectly.

      Yeah, you have to know what you’re doing in general and there’s a lot of babysitting involved, but anyone who thinks it’s just useless is plain wrong. It’s fucking amazing.

      Edit: lol the article is referring to a study that was using GPT 3.5, which is all but useless for coding. 4.0 has been out for a year blowing everybody’s minds. Clickbait trash.

    • kjaeselrek@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah I’ve already got enough legacy code to deal with, I don’t need more of it faster.

    • vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      To be fair, I’m starting to fear that all the fun bits of human jobs are the ones that are most easy to automate.

      I dread the day I’m stuck playing project manager to a bunch of chat bots.