Other accounts:

@Danterious@lemm.ee

All of my comments are licensed under the following license

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.en

  • 73 Posts
  • 350 Comments
Joined 10 months ago
cake
Cake day: 15 August 2023

help-circle



  • Well on firefox/chrome extensions you can search for text expander and choose an extension that works for you.

    Or if you are using a phone you can do the same on the app store and I think there should be a few options.

    Once you download one of them it should give instructions on how to use it, but in general it asks you to create a phrase that you want to be automatically triggered and a shorter phrase that automatically replaced with the longer phrase.

    For example-

    long phrase: The quick brown fox jumped over the moon.

    short phrase: /qfox

    and every time you typed /qfox it would replace it with “The quick brown fox jumped over the moon.”

    Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)







  • Danterious@lemmy.dbzer0.comtoCasual Conversation @lemm.eeThere should be a law
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Because trying to make laws around socialization, at least for businesses, will lead to them just optimizing how to be just within the bounds of the law which pushes the problem down further and they have to create a new law for it. This is worse for socialization because it’s ambiguous meaning it can be “satisfied” without really being satisfied.

    It’s like a parent telling a child a rule for the house without the child understanding why. The child will follow the rules because there is expected punishment but it is fragile. If the child understands why and agrees then the child will follow the rules and it will be robust.

    So yeah you can do both but I think only one of them actually solves the issue, the other just delays it.

    Edit: added apostrophes.

    Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)









  • Happy cakeday. And yeah deescalation requires both parties to open to de-arm not only one of them.

    Honestly though the best case scenario of how this all ends doesn’t really look great to me.

    Either Russia loses the war, the government destabilizes, a power vacuum is formed which causes a power shift in a way likely to lead to more aggressive action in the future.

    Or Russia wins the war, eyes other countries after it settles into Ukraine, NATO/US need to respond or else it sends the wrong message to other countries allied with them, and we head for WW3

    Edit: There is also the idea of a stalemate and this just becomes a continuous war that doesn’t really end, but honestly I can’t see that being stable long term.

    Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)