• MrMakabar
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 days ago

    The answer would be high speed night trains. London - Rome takes a bit over 15h by train today. However that includes waiting for connections and a lot of stops on stations. So a direct train would be siginificantly faster probably more like 12-13h. That would mean you could go into a train station in London at 20:00 and end up in Rome at 8:00 for example.

    Stockholm - Barcelona is a much longer journey. 2250km instead of 1400km for Rome - London. So a very long nigh train or a connection in Hamburg or Paris. with a night train going from there to Barcelona or Stockholm respectivly.

    • isolatedscotch@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      as much as I love trains (I’m on one while typing this) I can’t get myself to spend 170€ for a 21 hour train, even if part of it is spent sleeping, when a 2 hour flight could do the same for 50€.

      I don’t know if it’s just cheaper or if there’s massive subsidies like other comments were saying, but for now it’s highly unpractical and uneconomical