• Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    24 days ago

    Even after phasing out PFOA under pressure, DuPont and its spinoff Chemours have continued releasing the toxic substance into the environment, leading to recent Congressional demands for an explanation.

    So, it’s not even about profits anymore. You’re now PAYING to poison Americans. How is this ok? Not that it was ok before, but this takes it to a whole NEW level of evil.

  • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    23 days ago

    Regardless of how they screwed up, the PFOAS should not be banned. They should be restricted to uses that require the material for national defense and for technology development. There’s stuff that PFOAS can do that not much else can. For example cooking utensils are a dumb use, but components for machines that make cars or solar panels. For example capacitors need the material because it has a high voltage breakdown. Smart uses, not stupid wasteful and polluting uses.

    • fritobugger2017@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      23 days ago

      Uncontrolled discharge of waste in all uses is a major issue for all PFOAs though and I am not sure that there is anyway to handle the waste that it doesn’t get back into the environment.

      • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        22 days ago

        It’s actually very simple. Waste management is expensive, so pass that expense on to the technology that needs PFOAS. If they do that by law requirement, then the problem will correct itself because it would be too expensive to use on stupid things like cooking pots.