HardlightCereal@lemmy.world to Fediverse@lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 months agoLemmy.world removes its rules against discriminationlemmy.worldimagemessage-square42fedilinkarrow-up184arrow-down182
arrow-up12arrow-down1imageLemmy.world removes its rules against discriminationlemmy.worldHardlightCereal@lemmy.world to Fediverse@lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 months agomessage-square42fedilink
minus-squaresimple@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up64arrow-down6·edit-28 months agoI’m pretty sure the ToS only exists for legal reasons, don’t make a big deal out of this. It doesn’t mean the admins won’t ban people for discrimination. Nothing suggests their stance has changed.
minus-squareHEISENBERG@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up60arrow-down5·8 months agoIt’s always the same trolls. Who would read the ToS and say “ok guess racism is back on the table”.
minus-squareredballooon@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13arrow-down10·8 months agoThen why the change?
minus-squaresimple@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up17arrow-down9·8 months agoNothing was changed, it’s a new document.
minus-squareBolexForSoup@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up12arrow-down19·edit-28 months agoIf it’s not a big deal then it shouldn’t be too hard to mention you can’t discriminate against someone’s religion/race/gender/etc. These things are a big enough deal they need to be removed but suddenly “it’s not a big deal” when people want them back.
minus-squaresimple@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18arrow-down5·8 months agoA) They weren’t removed, this is a new document B) As other comments mention, discrimination and harassment is covered in section 5 C) Consider messaging the admins about it rather than push the alert button and causing needless drama
minus-squareBolexForSoup@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down21·8 months agoIt’s not covered in section 5. Go read it.
minus-squareclueless_stoner@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up25arrow-down4·edit-27 months agodeleted by creator
minus-squaremosiacmango@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·8 months agoSo section 5 covers all the same areas of harassment as the previous code of conduct? These are all bannable still on lemmy.world?
minus-squareintensely_human@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down9·8 months agoHow would a user of an internet forum exhibit discrimination?
I’m pretty sure the ToS only exists for legal reasons, don’t make a big deal out of this. It doesn’t mean the admins won’t ban people for discrimination. Nothing suggests their stance has changed.
It’s always the same trolls. Who would read the ToS and say “ok guess racism is back on the table”.
Then why the change?
Nothing was changed, it’s a new document.
That is a change
deleted by creator
If it’s not a big deal then it shouldn’t be too hard to mention you can’t discriminate against someone’s religion/race/gender/etc.
These things are a big enough deal they need to be removed but suddenly “it’s not a big deal” when people want them back.
A) They weren’t removed, this is a new document
B) As other comments mention, discrimination and harassment is covered in section 5
C) Consider messaging the admins about it rather than push the alert button and causing needless drama
It’s not covered in section 5. Go read it.
deleted by creator
So section 5 covers all the same areas of harassment as the previous code of conduct? These are all bannable still on lemmy.world?
How would a user of an internet forum exhibit discrimination?