• aksdb@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    Theoretically they could deny serving byte ranges before the end-of-ad mark until those bytes have been served and a plausible time (the duration of the ad) has passed. Practically this is likely more expensive than what the ad revenue would yield.

    • jet@hackertalks.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      Sure, but then you just need a youtube front running cache that preloads videos, or load multiple videos at the same time… i know i’m not the only person who watches youtube at 3x speed, so you could speed up past the ad, etc.

      • Amju Wolf@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        They could use stream encryption (DRM) to ensure you’re viewing the ads as expected and make it hard to capture and playback.

        • jet@hackertalks.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Its a arms race, you could always just record the screen with a camera and edit it out as the ultimate.

          you could spin up a vm, and capture the video output

          you could use a graphics driver that lets you inspect the frame buffer, etc

          you could use the side channel attacks to get the decrypted video frames, heartbleed etc, etc etc

          • Amju Wolf@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Do these actually work against HDCP? (Outside using a camera, obviously). I know it used to work decently well against most “ordinary” attacks like VMs and capture cards.

            • jet@hackertalks.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              I believe HDCP keys have already been leaked, I can find a couple different references to them on GitHub even.

    • GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      This would probably be unviable, since from a UX standpoint you want the first segments of the non-ad content to be preloaded when the ad ends.

      • aksdb@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        That will be irrelevant when the control freaks take over. Case in point: anti piracy ads in the good old DVD/BluRay days. Unskippable shit that ironically only punishes people who bought legitimate media.

        • GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          I honestly think that the people at Google are a bit smarter than that, but we’ll see whether that holds or not.