• ristoril_zip@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    The First Peoples of North America definitely didn’t have such sharp, well defined border lines. It’s not as of they had a bunch of written treaties establishing hard borders.

    • Khrux@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 months ago

      This is a conceptual alternate history map of modern day North America without colonisation. It’s still reasonably inaccurate of course but it’s not meant to accurately portray the borders of a pre-colonised North America.

      • Mercival@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Sioux is a name given by the colonizers. It’s not just the borders.

        • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          iirc its a word for enemy, IE the colonists encountered a rival tribe, and never cared to correct their mistake.

          • Mercival@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 months ago

            The Wikipedia says it comes from a French misspelling of an indigenous word that could be used to describe the people. So it might be a little less offensive than that, but still not great.

            • Meowoem@sh.itjust.works
              cake
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 months ago

              In English we use Norse meaning northern people, unsurprisingly it is the word originally used to describe them by people south of them. Those people now called Germans get their name from ceaser when he invaded from Italy, named by the Greeks, who in turn derive their modern name from the Romans because they called themselves Hellanes… Spain gets it’s name probably because it was located near a rabbit on a Roman coin… They also named Britain of course and all of them would be the ones going to the new world and naming things there

              It’s weird but it’s pretty common

    • spez@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I think they are referring to the British settlements that led to modern America…?

    • Ghyste@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      The illegal immigrants in this case would be European settlers and the added text makes the meme, I think. I had to double take on this one as well.

      • tubaruco@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        yeah, but i just dont really understand the map. is it just a map showing where the native population lived before colonization or is there an actual joke in there?

  • JimmyBigSausage@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    8 months ago

    Why are the Hopi drawn in Texas? They were/are in current northern Arizona. Texas had Tawakoni, Wichita, Kickapoo and Comanche tribes.

  • kandoh@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    It’s interesting how these lines are still pretty accurate for cultural divisions in colonial NA. At least at at quick glance.