cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/415628
Check it, Felipe Corrêa has a new article looking at the various debates in the anarchist tradition!
Thank you for sharing. Looking forward to perusing
Great read.
Its very helpful to understand the divisions within anarchy and the differences between different flavors of anarchists.
I also like how the definition of an anarchist proposed by the text includes historical context. And expands anarchic study past the usual eurocentric window. Anarchy like most things should not be about “great men”
Can’t wait to take a look!
Non European anarchists listed in a section of the article.
“However, on the other hand, Bandeira Negra proposes that many other anarchists ought to be included in the canon, alongside the familiar duo of Bakunin and Kropotkin. These include: Ricardo Flores Magón (Mexican, 1874-1922); Ida Mett (Russian, 1901-1973); Edgard Leuenroth (Brazilian, 1881-1968); Ba Jin (Chinese, 1904-2005); Mikhail Gerdzhikov (Bulgarian, 1877-1947); He Zhen (Chinese, 1884-1920); T.W. Thibedi (South African, 1888-1960); Kim Jwa-Jin (Korean, 1889-1930); Sam Dolgoff (Russian-American, 1902-1990); Emma Goldman (Lithuanian, 1869-1940); Enrique Roig de San Martín (Cuban, 1843-1889); Constantinos Speras (Greek, 1893-1943); Monty Myler (Australian, 1839-1920); Lucy Parsons (American, 1853-1942); and many others, including recent additions, that had or have importance in the field of anarchist thought or action.”
Great read.
Its very helpful to understand the divisions within anarchy and the differences between different flavors of anarchists.
I also like how the definition of an anarchist proposed by the text includes historical context. And expands anarchic study past the usual eurocentric window. Anarchy like most things should not be about “great men”
