• IWantToFuckSpez@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    7 months ago

    The Dutch and British just took home the natives of their colonies as immigrants who opened restaurants. Why try to emulate when you can get the real deal?

  • Clbull@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’m British. Don’t put the Dutch in the same group as us. Our local ‘cuisine’ truly is a crime to food.

    • Treczoks@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 months ago

      No, it isn’t. I have dined exceptionally well in the UK. Our Christmas dinner is based on an a recipe from an English cook. We have a Scottish cafe/diner in town which serves excellent food.

      OK, I’ve dined horribly, too, but it is definitely not the norm - I made the mistake of ordering half a chicken in a fish and chips shop. My recommendation: Don’t repeat my mistake.

    • Aganim@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 months ago

      I’m Dutch, feel free to put us in the same group. They way we drown our potatoes in gravy absolutely is a crime against food.

    • Sunfoil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      Except it isn’t though. You have shitty fast food like the rest of the world, but we also have Michelin star restaurants too. This is just yet another excuse for people to be xenophobic to the British.

      • Globulart@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        And there are loads of excuses already. No need to manufacture an extra one! I wonder how many Michelin star restaurants in the UK claim to serve traditional British food though.

        But genuinely, does the rest of the world dislike fish and chips, roast dinners, fried breakfasts, and pies? I know the stereotype has been around forever but I always had trouble believing that most non British people wouldn’t really like those foods.

        • Sunfoil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          My understanding is a lot of them. The majority of restaurants in the Michelin guide certaintly are British cuisine. The stars, I’m not so sure. I would say there isn’t really any reason to be xenophobic or racist to anyone.

          • Globulart@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Yeah of course mate, it was a joke about how (historically) we’ve given people plenty of excuses to be.

  • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    7 months ago

    They really did did Kill millions of people to get spices and then decide they didn’t like any of them.

  • Mr_Blott@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    7 months ago

    Yanks on their way to just cover bland, mass produced shite in butter and salt so they can proclaim it “the gradest food in the wuuuurld”

    • madcaesar@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      I don’t think Americans claim we have the greatest food in the world lol Cheap? Yes. Fast? Yes. BBQ? Yes!

    • TIMMAY@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      to be honest, I dont know a single fellow american that thinks that “american food” (whatever that even means) is better than just about any other variety. Yet what you said is true nonetheless lmao

      • Clbull@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        To that I say ‘what American food?’

        Because there’s a massive difference in quality between a Big Mac and a Philly Cheesesteak

  • Knusper@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Fucks me up as a German, too. Globalization gave us all kinds of tasty spices, but go to any public event and you’d be convinced our greatest culinary achievement is sausage with tomato ketchup and curry powder.

      • Knusper@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Also wenn du mich so fragst, hätte ich gerne so Döner-style Fladenbrot mit Kümmel, Schwarzkümmel und Senfkörnern im Teig. Das dann von innen bestrichen mit etwas Erdnussmus. Dann das übliche Döner-Grünzeug rein, aber kurz scharf in einem Wok angebraten und in Soja-Sauce getaucht. Darüber frisch gemalener bunter Pfeffer und ein guter Esslöffel kaltgepresstes Rapsöl. Und dann Champignons geschnetzelt + ordentlich angebraten und mit Gyros-Gewürzen mariniert noch darin einbetten.

        Ich denke, das sollte man gut in so einem Imbisswagen zubereiten können. 🙃

        Also habe jetzt natürlich übertrieben. Keine Ahnung, ob das noch gut ist. Aber habe tatsächlich schonmal so Champignon-Geschnetzeltes in einem Fladenbrot gemacht und das war extrem geil. Seither hätte ich tatsächlich gerne mal einen vollwertigen Döner damit…

    • i mean the good stuff is not typically served at these events. I’m thinking roulade and gulash that need to simmer for multiple hours.

      Also in central Europe it is difficult to consider foods distinct to one country. Most of Polish, Czech and German cuisine overlap a lot.

      • Knusper@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Well, yeah, to some degree these are just very easy to prepare. To some degree, they’re just the lowest common denominator, though, which is what I’m mainly annoyed by. Lots of these simpler foods could be easily improved by adding some spices, or we could even adopt some of the many street foods in Eastern Asia, to bring in more variety…

    • letsgocrazy@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      British invention anyway. Curry powder from the British occupying forces in Berlin.

      Gern gesehen.

      • lugal@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        But “Currywurst” (curry sausage) was invented in Berlin. Indian wouldn’t use curry powder without vegetables in this way, or currypower at all (correct me if I’m wrong)

        • Knusper@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          I’m no expert either, but yeah, I believe the lazy method of making the curry dish (Indian, Thai etc.) is to use curry paste. Our curry powder barely resembles the taste of the curry dish. In particular, it’s lacking tons of chili. 🫠

          • lugal@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            I was once explained that curry in the Indian sense is a rice vegetable dish with a lot of spices. To make it easier for the Brits, the powder was developed so that you don’t need all the fresh spices.

            • emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works
              cake
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              Curry in India is usually a side-dish served with rice or chapathi (flatbread). It contains a lot of vegetables, various herbs and spices, and optionally fish or meat. But the rice itself is not a part of the curry. Also we do use curry powder, mainly when we don’t have time or space to mix the spices properly.

        • letsgocrazy@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Did you read the entire sentence “the British occupying forces in Berlin”

          British. In Berlin.

          Who do you think had lots of curry powder?

          • lugal@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Curry powder is a British invention, Currywurst is German, only possible with the British but still a German invention

  • sgbrain7@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    7 months ago

    This reminds me of an old post I remember seeing where it depicted the contrast between anime food and English film food with some eggs. The anime ones were drawn with utmost care to look downright heavenly, while the English film eggs were very scraggly.

    • EvolvedTurtle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Genuinely I want more foreign food to be more common Like I live in the US so it’s pretty common it’s just hella expensive

      Unless you get the questionable Americanized version like taco bell and panda express

  • SharkEatingBreakfast@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Legitimately, though: I listened to my sister tell her 4-year about “yummy spices” at Thanksgiving. The example she used was “like salt!” I was horrified.

    She also made & brought the absolute worst green bean casserole I have ever tasted in my life. It was like wet, crunchy green beans covered in French-fried onions (which came from a can, which is why it’s pretty much the only thing she got right).

    She used “no added salt/sodium” cream-of-mushroom soup, the green beans, and the canned fried onions, and added nothing else.

    I love green bean casserole, as it’s one of my favorite Thanksgiving foods. Even offered to make it for everyone this year! But she insisted that she wanted to do it.

    The only thing that was salty this Thanksgiving was me.

  • T1000@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    Dutch and British food isn’t bad, unless your a yank that only eats things pumped full of sugar.

  • TWeaK@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    The English have tikka masala, the Dutch have satay chicken.

  • V ‎ ‎ @beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    My Jamaican friend once said: “How many times do I have to tell you people flour is not a spice”.

    • Altima NEO@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      And let’s be real, the Brits gave up their own food in favor of Indian food. They love that Tikka masala.

        • HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          If we’re to insist on it being a specific country’s food, it really should be Indian no? It was invented by Indian diaspora in the UK as (IIRC) a take on traditional Indian food using ingredients that are easier to obtain in the UK.

          IMO saying tikka masala is British food is like saying General Tso’s Chicken, which was invented by Chinese diaspora in the US for similar reasons, is somehow American food. I don’t think the country it was invented in can really claim credit in either case.

          • scubbo@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            7 months ago

            Tikka Masala is an Indian-Inspired dish which was invented in the UK by people with Indian cultural heritage. That’s about as concise a description as you can get without running into difficulties of definition - there’s no consistent way of defining what “being a dish” means without running into contradictions.

            In fact General Tso’s is the perfect counter-example: Multiple Chinese people have told me they enthusiastically disown General Tso’s Chicken and explicitly call it American food. So if we say “a dish belongs to a country if it’s invented there”, then Tikka Masala is British (which I agree “feels” wrong); but if we say “a dish belongs to a country if it was inspired by the cuisine of that country”, then General Tso’s is Chinese, which, apparently not!

            And that’s without even considering the question of how far “back” you should go with inspiration - what if a dish was inspired by how the Indians used food they got from the Persians who traded it with the Chinese - is it Indian food or Chinese food? (Idk if that’s historically nonsense, but you get my point) Why is the most-recent ancestor more important than the environment of creation?