• nottheengineer@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    7 months ago

    CRTs don’t have pixels so the resolution of the signal isn’t that important. It’s about the inherent softness you get from the technology. It’s better than any anti-aliasing we have today.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        That image is a digital rendering of the raw data, not a photo of how a CRT would render it.

        CRTs were nothing if not the opposite of jagged.

          • grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            “Blurred” is the opposite of “jagged,” though.

            The jaggedness of the 2600 wasn’t because the TV itself was jagged; it was because the 2600 was so low-resolution (160x192, maximum) that it had to be upscaled – naively, with no antialiasing! – even just to get to NTSC (480 scanlines, give or take).

            So yeah, when each “pixel” is three scanlines tall, of course it’s going to look jagged even after the CRT blurs it!

            • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              A high resolution LCD with anti aliasing will do a better job than a low resolution crt. Crt shadowmasks defined the limits of pixels and it wasn’t good even on computers that could output higher than 2600 resolution.

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      CRTs do have pixels. If they didn’t, you could run an SVGA signal (800x600 at 60 Hz) directly into any CRT. If you tried this, it would likely damage the tube beyond repair.

      The exact mechanism varied between manufacturers and types: http://filthypants.blogspot.com/2020/02/crt-shader-masks.html

      I certainly saw aliasing problems on CRTs, though usually on computer monitors that had higher resolution and better connection standards. The image being inherently “soft” is related to limited resolution and shitty connections. SCART with RGB connections will bring out all the jagginess. The exact same display running on composite will soften it and make it go away, but at the cost of a lot of other things looking like shit.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        CRTs do have pixels. If they didn’t, you could run an SVGA signal (800x600 at 60 Hz) directly into any CRT. If you tried this, it would likely damage the tube beyond repair.

        Would it, though? I’m skeptical.

        If it did, it wouldn’t be because they have “pixels,” though; it would be because overdriving the deflection yoke with higher-frequency signals would generate too much heat for the TV to handle.

        Otherwise (if it didn’t overheat), it should “work.” The result might look weird if the modulation of the signal didn’t line up with the apertures in the shadow mask right, but I don’t see any reason why sweeping the beam across faster would damage the phosphors. (Also, I’m not convinced a black & white TV would have any problem at all.)

        • frezik@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          It will tend to turn the beam on when it’s off to the side, outside the normal range of the screen. X Windows users in the mid 90s had to put in their exact scanline information or else the screen could blow up. That went away with a combination of multiscan monitors and monitors being able to communicate their preferred settings, but those came pretty late in the CRT era.

          Edit: in any case, color screens need to have at least bands of red/green/blue phosphor. At a minimum, there will be breaks along either the horizontal or vertical lines, if not both.

          • grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            When you say “blow up” do you mean the tube would literally explode, it would burn through phosphors, a circuit board would let the magic smoke out, or something else?

            I remember configuring mode lines in X. Luckily, I never found out the hard way what happened if you got it wrong.