About 125,000 notices will be sent to high-income earners, including 25,000 people with income more than $1 million, the tax agency said

This is who the Republican party’s complaints about the IRS are intended to protect.

  • @TexasDrunk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    783 months ago

    The IRS came after me over the taxes for a couple of grand on a repossessed car that I never got the paperwork on. Apparently I should have just made a few million and not filed at all rather than losing everything I had.

    • Cethin
      link
      fedilink
      English
      63 months ago

      The issue is these people can afford accountants and other people to draw out and hinder the process. Poor people just have to pay or be held accountable. That’s why low IRS funding hurts poor people and high funding hurts rich people. If they’ve got the money, they can go after the wealthy and, in turn, get even more money from them than they spent to get it.

    • @Djtecha@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      -563 months ago

      So your argument here is they shouldn’t go after those people now? No, I get you’re annoyed that you got fucked in relation to these fucks, but this is a step in the right direction right?

      • @TexasDrunk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        53 months ago

        No, that’s not at all what I’m saying. I’m saying that I was so broke that my car was repossessed and the IRS sees that as me making money. So they billed someone who had literally nothing to their name at the time. Yet due to shit funding they can’t go after millionaires who don’t even fucking file who should be their highest priority because that would bring in both more money for public good and more money for the IRS to go after the bigger fish rather than penny ante bullshit.

        • @Djtecha@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          13 months ago

          I agree. They need to be properly funded to go after the rich assholes hiding behind lawyers. The recent funding is a good thing IMHO. Because otherwise the norm is to continue targeting folks like you.

  • Spot
    link
    fedilink
    English
    403 months ago

    Sooo… Not only has it not trickled down but, they haven’t even paid their fair share, huh? Who woulda’ thought?!

    • Rayquetzalcoatl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      33 months ago

      Oh come on buddy… It hasn’t trickled down because they haven’t paid their fair share yet! Doubtless the cheque is in the mail and it just got lost for a few years or something; it’ll all start trickling down in no time don’t you worry!!

  • Politically Incorrect
    link
    fedilink
    19
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Obvious the rich didn’t pay tax at all, evade the most time possible to paid it or use tricks to pay the most less posible, it’s a classic, the middle and low class are the ones which pay the majority of tax and in time, it’s the way capitalism work.

    The funny thing it’s how some people are proud of paying tax while the rich didn’t pay a fuck LMAO.

    • @silence7OP
      link
      21
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      The Republicans have long had a strategy of requiring the IRS to heavily audit use of the earned income tax credit for the poor, while starving it for resources, so that it couldn’t audit the richest.

      The Inflation Reduction Act the Democrats passed a couple years back gave the IRS money to actually go after the wealthy, which is what we’re seeing here.

      • @Asafum@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        93 months ago

        The Inflation Reduction Act the Democrats passed a couple years back gave the IRS money to actually go after the wealthy, which is what we’re seeing here.

        And of course the goddamn scum of the earth propagandists screamed “the Democrats are funding the IRS to COME AFTER YOU!!” And we now have a talking point about how the IRS needs to be defunded to “protect the little guy.” It’s so disgusting… I hate these people so much.

        • @RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          33 months ago

          Every story we’ve seen on the news in the last 50 years about an “overzealous IRS harrassing the little guy” has been complete bullshit propped up by conservatives and their capitalist buddies.

        • @silence7OP
          link
          103 months ago

          The Republicans openly favor the 1%, which is a big difference between the parties

            • @silence7OP
              link
              93 months ago

              The Democrats very much less so; a big chunk of their coalition is the labor unions who are outside that demographic.

              • Politically Incorrect
                link
                fedilink
                -93 months ago

                They just like to play the role, at the end both parties work for the elite. They love money and they are capable of do anything for it.

                Obviously they are not so open about it, there should remain the illusion of choice.

                • @silence7OP
                  link
                  103 months ago

                  The Democrats are a coalition, and not every coalition member is on board with downward redistribution, but a big chunk are, and it has a history of showing in the policies they implement.

  • @BigMacHole@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    133 months ago

    That’s called GOOD BUSINESS! The TRUE Leeches are the SINGLE MOTHERS using FOOD STAMPS to feed their KIDS!

    • @EatATaco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      113 months ago

      If you’re getting a refund, it’s means you’ve been over paying and giving Uncle Sam an interest free loan.

      I haven’t gotten a (federal) refund in years. Every year I pay at tax time, so that money is sitting in my savings account for the year gaining interest rather sitting in the governments account gaining interest. We aren’t talking a ton of money, but it’s the type of game I can’t help but play if it’s available.

      • @hansl@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        53 months ago

        For the record, if your taxes are higher than a certain number you have to pay it every quarter, otherwise you will owe interest on it at the end of the year. So what EatATaco said is mostly true.

        • @EatATaco@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          23 months ago

          Sure, I should have made that clear that if you arent close, you’ll pay a penalty.

        • @mkrup@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          13 months ago

          Actual CPA here, you’ll owe an underpayment of estimated tax penalty if you don’t pay in at least the lesser of 90% of current year/100% of prior year (110% if AGI >$150K) tax. The penalty is based on the Federal short term rate and prorated based on amount underpaid and time outstanding (i.e. Q1 is overdue for the whole year but only 1/4 of the underpayment, Q4 is the whole amount but only late by one quarter). When all is said and done, it usually works out to like 2% and we have plenty of clients that would rather hold the cash and pay the penalty because it’s generally cheaper than borrowing, or they figure they can get a greater rate of return by interesting it (depending on their situation/perspective).

          If you miss April 15th it goes to credit card rates though (failure to pay penalty, which is very different from underpayment of estimated tax). Don’t do that. Remember: an extension is for time to file, not time to pay.

    • @silence7OP
      link
      7
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      The super-rich don’t get much of their income from wages, where there is withholding of a bit more than you’re likely to owe if the wages are your only income. They get it from interest, dividends, and running a business. There is usually not withholding for those, so they’re supposed to make quarterly payments. But the Republicans cut IRS funding years ago, so it didn’t have the resources to go after them if they just stopped paying. So a lot did just that.

      • @Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        43 months ago

        People living anywhere less than 10 million aren’t generally living off of dividends though either. Switching to that too soon is a common mistake many of the “merely rich” make.

        • @silence7OP
          link
          3
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Sure, but they’re talking about people with income of more than 1 million. If they’re living off interest and dividends, they’ve probably got something in the realm of $30-75 million in assets.