• LibertyLizard
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I think it’s perfectly reasonable to have a policy against doxxing on online spaces. As long as it is enforced consistently.

    I don’t use or follow the details of Twitter nonsense very closely so I have no idea if this is the case.

      • LibertyLizard
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 months ago

        Not very surprising. I have no idea why their user base hasn’t left yet.

    • punkisundead [they/them]M
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      When a consistent enforcement of a policy protects neo nazis the policy needs to get evaluated tho

      • LibertyLizard
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        Open to that discussion but doxxing can be dangerous for some people more than others. Overall I see more downside than upside on large platforms. If it is allowed, I would expect more innocents/good people to be harmed than neonazis. And as we can see here, there are plenty of other spaces for this type of information to be shared.

        Of course, since Elon Musk decides their policies and we don’t, it’s a bit of a moot point.

      • LwL@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        Absolutely any policy that protects people can protect neo nazis. If a platform wants someone gone for being a dickwad, they can just ban them (not that that’s gonna happen to nazis on twitter). Questioning sensible rules because they happen to protect bad people sometimes is some dystopian shit. It’s the same line of argument as wanting to ban e2e encryption to scan messages for csam.

        Doxxing is a crime in some places, only selectively enforcing that would be quite the problem.