• ReiRose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    If perhaps you explained yourself in the original comment, I would not have assumed incorrectly.

    Your question doesn’t even fully cover point c, let alone a and b. I’m not psychic 🤷‍♀️

    • z00s@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I didn’t have to, because it was a question. Your ridiculous response is on you, buddy 🤷‍♂️

      • ReiRose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        You absolutely didn’t have to. And my response is absolutely on me. If your goal was to be ambiguous with your question, you achieved it. If your goal was to outline points a, b and c above, you did not succeed.

        • z00s@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          You’re trying to impose a goal then claiming that I failed? You’re really telling on yourself here bud