How would an anarchist society compare to statist and capitalist societies? It is apparent that hierarchical societies work well according to certain criteria. They tend to be extremely effective at conquering their neighbors and securing vast fortunes for their rulers. On the other hand, as climate change, food and water shortages, market instability, and other global crises intensify, hierarchical models are not proving to be particularly sustainable. The histories in this book show that an anarchist society can do much better at enabling all its members to meet their needs and desires.

The many stories, past and present, that demonstrate how anarchy works have been suppressed and distorted because of the revolutionary conclusions we might draw from them. We can live in a society with no bosses, masters, politicians, or bureaucrats; a society with no judges, no police, and no criminals, no rich or poor; a society free of sexism, homophobia, and transphobia; a society in which the wounds from centuries of enslavement, colonialism, and genocide are finally allowed to heal. The only things stopping us are the prisons, programming, and paychecks of the powerful, as well as our own lack of faith in ourselves.

  • jadero
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    I see what you’re getting at, and I mostly agree. Yes, the whole thing is still resting on the goodwill and good behaviour of the participants.

    But I don’t know that access is orthogonal to what you call governance in anarchistic systems. I think that balance of or limits to power requires ready access to all.

    • keepthepace
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      Ok, yes I agree, ease of access is important. I just mean that lowering the material barrier of entry is not enough to make a project anarchist in nature.