• AndyOP
      2·
      5 months ago

      I think it’s discouraging and unkind to artists to offer criticism that isn’t in some way constructive.

      I think criticism is great: when it’s constructive.

      That’s when you say what you’d like to make the art better. To issue constructive criticism, all you have to do is say WHAT you don’t like, so that the artist can learn and – assuming they want to make art you like better next time – incorporate that feedback. That’s what constructive criticism means.

    • Moira_Mayhem@beehaw.org
      2·
      5 months ago

      Actual art criticism is a bit more nuanced and based on a fundamental grounding of understanding with the medium.

      If you walk up to a Jackson Pollock painting and say ‘That’s bad’, literally no one interested in painting will call your statement art criticism.

          • Yer Ma@lemm.ee
            3·
            5 months ago

            Come on, who hasn’t been to the MOMA? Honestly I was kinda joking, I’m not a fan of abstract splatter-type arts, to me that kind of thing seems incredibly self centered of the artist and ofter low effort or wasted effort without conveying a universal beauty of any kind and instead forcing viewers to have to accept that the artist must have seen something that they don’t… It’s not friendly or inviting as an experience for anyone that isn’t in the “know”, you know?

            • Moira_Mayhem@beehaw.org
              2·
              5 months ago

              I have to agree that a lot of ‘modern’ art is pretentious and self-indulgent, for this one artist I put aside my distaste after seeing one up close. It’s not just paint splatters, there’s work in the texture. They’re more of kind of 3d art than anything.

              That said, thinks like that joker who taped a banana to a gallery wall just piss me of to no end.