• aDogCalledSpot@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    My girlfriend was looking to get a new IUD after her last one was expiring. For some reason the normal approach is completely without anaesthesia. There are so many horror stories of women being in awful pain during and up to weeks after the procedure. She looked around for a gynecologist with a focus on contraception (most focus on conception which is kind of annoying if you’re not at that stage in life yet) and we were able to find one. He said there’s no reason to not be using local anaesthesia. The procedure was very simple. Unbelievable how many women are going through pain that would be entirely preventable.

    • BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s true. People are telling me in the comments that it’s painless, but having a device shoved into your cervix without anesthesia is terrible.

      • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        There’s probably some theory like “you can’t get proper patient feedback with anesthesia” or some such bullshit.

        • meowMix2525@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          3 months ago

          No medical consensus just decided based on a bunk study by Alfred Kinsey that, because only 5% of women could feel a “gentle stroke” to the cervix by a small probe, the cervix must be “the most completely insensitive part of the female anatomy” and not possess any nerve endings and therefore it must be fake when women complain about having any sensation there. Nevermind that the data in the study itself disproved its own conclusion and the 3 major nerve groups that are stimulated by the cervix.

    • gmtom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 months ago

      Wait so if its local anesthesia does that men your girlfriend had an injection into her cervix directly?? Because the idea of that makes me want to scream.

      • aDogCalledSpot@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yes. But the alternative is to feel the IUD penetrate the cervix and then hook into the uterus. And if youre getting a replacement, like was the case for her, you get to go through all of that backwards beforehand as well. It makes a prick from a syringe (although painful) seem pretty good by comparison.

    • Okokimup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      The place that put in my IUD wouldn’t even give me ibuprofen; I had to use my own. I went back the next day to take the horrid thing out.

  • idiomaddict@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    3 months ago

    I was amazed the first time I went to a gynecologist outside of planned parenthood. It didn’t hurt at all. I don’t blame them, they’re often brand new doctors under incredible time and budget constraints, but it does make a difference. I didn’t even go to an expensive gynecologist’s office, I went to the income-scaled local general clinic, but they get a lot more support from insurance and the state than PP.

    • BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I worked for the greatest gynecologist on the planet and supervised his pelvic exams. Never seen someone do such a good job.

    • NightAuthor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      You’d kinda need to be a female gynecological researcher w clout, and then maybe like 40 years after you demonstrate a need for a new technique, it might start to catch on.

    • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      3 months ago

      I would imagine that tolerating the pain was beaten into women for so long that at this point it would be futile to try to change it because they would be shamed and seen as weak.

    • ReiRose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      So b your logic, do you believe some minority cops means no institutionalised racism in policing?

        • ReiRose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          I don’t believe for a second that you didn’t know there were female gynecologists. You were attempting to shift blame, not ask questions and engage in meaningful discourse.

          • z00s@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            I was making people question the original premise that a. No gynecological procedures involve sedation b. That this still occurs universally and contemporaneously and c. That male doctors somehow have exclusive and universal control over procedures and have denied sedation out of deliberate malfeasance.

            You then tried to apply a false reading to an unrelated situation to create a false equivalency.

            Your comment was as ludicrous as saying, “You don’t like chocolate ice cream? So what you’re saying is that you support the bombing of Palestine!!!”

            • ReiRose@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              If perhaps you explained yourself in the original comment, I would not have assumed incorrectly.

              Your question doesn’t even fully cover point c, let alone a and b. I’m not psychic 🤷‍♀️

              • z00s@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                I didn’t have to, because it was a question. Your ridiculous response is on you, buddy 🤷‍♂️

                • ReiRose@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  You absolutely didn’t have to. And my response is absolutely on me. If your goal was to be ambiguous with your question, you achieved it. If your goal was to outline points a, b and c above, you did not succeed.

  • pyrflie@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Anesthesia is pretty damn dangerous. There are a ton of modern Dentists abandoning the practice to Dental Surgeons.

    That level of liability would kill Gynecology due to insurance.

    • OpenPassageways@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’m assuming you’re referring to the dangers of being “put under” right? Another commenter mentioned local anaesthetic… I don’t think dentists are shying away from that and it seems appropriate for these situations.

      • pyrflie@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        I’m not even sure local anesthetic would be possible in the way that you mean. Novocaine is used to target mapped nerve bundles to temporarily shut down about 1/8th of the jaw’s nervous systems. This isn’t really possible for the region in question due to overlapping nervous regions and the location of the nerve clusters. There are topical creams that could be used but this would just numb the skin and from accounts it sounds like most of the pain experienced is the result of muscular distress. Epidurals exist but this is still a pretty invasive and dangerous procedure for a routine checkup that may result in as much pain as it would relieve.

        Frankly less physically invasive exploratory techniques such as fiber optic probes similar to those used in laparoscopic surgery would be a much safer, if more expensive and less thorough, option for those that experience distress.

  • Vilian@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    3 months ago

    err, not trying to be that guy, my girlfriend said that gynecology didn’t hurt, and she went to public health care here in brasil, so i think is just lack of competency, and USA health system?

    • Squirrelsdrivemenuts@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      I think you need to talk to more than one girl about that… really depends on the procedure, your sensitivity down there and the competence of the gynaecologist. I’ve been to appointments that were fine and I’ve been there near crying from pain…

      • Vilian@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        true true didn’t think about that, the system need a way to report these cases where a painless procedure become pantiful because of incompetence, so the shit doctor learn how todo it properly or people start to avoid him/she

      • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        Mostly every experience I’ve heard has been a good one. This is from Finland.

    • SirDankbud@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Endometriosis is more common than people without vaginas realize and it often goes undiagnosed. My wife was gaslit about the pain of gyno procedures for two whole decades until the a doctor finally diagnosed her. A diagnosis which only came due a tubal ligation procedure forcing the doctors to physically see all the scar tissue inside her.

      • Kiosade@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yup, my wife has it and it AMAZING how many doctors are ignorant about it. We literally had one doctor tell her she “probably didn’t have that, because Endo is a very complicated disease and blah blah blah”. Nevermind all the symptoms lining up and the fact her GRANDMA HAD IT.

        Went to a specialist surgeon focusing on it and he did a quick exam and was like “yep you have it, it felt like you have rocks in your vagina”. It was THAT obvious and yet no other fucking gyno she saw before that point noticed anything! Like doctors, please listen to your lady patients, PLEASE!

        • acetanilide@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          I always like when they say, “that’s rare so you don’t have that” (in regards to any potential diagnosis, really)

          It’s like they forget that “rare” doesn’t mean “inexistent”

          • Kiosade@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            Yeah, it just reminds me that not every doctor aced med school… someone had to be bottom of the class (while still technically passing).

    • rektdeckard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Sample size of 1. The point of this whole thread is that people don’t believe women when they say they are in pain. Obviously there are individual differences between patients, and differences in quality of care.

    • ReiRose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 months ago

      Your girlfriend is lucky. I’m a British woman. It hurts. How many other women need to post from how many countries to convince you?

      • gmtom@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        My girlfriend (also British) always complained it hurt until we moved and she got a new gyno and said with the new one she barely felt a thing.

        • Vilian@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          exactly that what i want to say, it don’t need to be painful and it’s the doctor fault. isn’t there a way to review these doctors, or alert others womans?, or they learn to do it properly or they start losing clients

      • Vilian@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        maybe, but from the answers look more like doctor stupidity than just certain woman being more sensitive or the exam be made literally to torture woman, not saying that the problem exist, but to fix it we need to blame correctly

      • poppy@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        I’m not conditioned to anything. I won’t argue I’m probably lucky but I’ve had 3 gynecologists in my life and routine examinations have been uncomfortable but have never hurt or made me cry.

      • illectrility@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        It’s not uncommon for medical procedures to hurt btw. An episiotomy is a surgery, though, and where I’m from it’s always done with anesthesia. Could be a US thing to do it without. It’s also not a “terrible thing” but a sometimes necessary procedure that can greatly benefit a mother and child when giving birth

        Edit: Just to be clear, though: There is definitely loads of stuff to criticize about gynecological procedures.

        Edit 2: Also, calling out an episiotomy like that is just unreasonable imo