It started out as a sci-fi genre, but some believe solarpunk holds the key to solving some of humanity's most pressing problems.

Very mainstream coverage, but I guess it’s not too bad from that perspective. And yes, green skyscrapers are a stupid idea.

  • arymandias@feddit.de
    25·
    3 months ago

    This type of architecture is the literal definition of green washing. It’s just a concrete tower with incredibly difficult to maintain trees. (Probably next to a 6 lane arterial road.)

    • GBU_28@lemm.eeEnglish
      14·
      3 months ago

      Though I totally agree with you, there is data that planting trees to line such roads does improve air quality, and slightly decreases noise.

      But that’s when the trees are ya know, near the road, not on a tower lol

      • SteveM
        3·
        3 months ago

        Good question. Adding trees and other forms of applied solarpunk to concrete “buildings that have already been built” is different than prefabricated green skyscrapers which would surely be greenwashing. Images like the one in the article can be valuable to introduce new people to solarpunk ideas and positive visions of the future.

          • SteveM
            2·
            3 months ago

            I don’t see why you wouldn’t plan for any type of tangible material changes, especially when discussing a livable and liberated future, so that’s definitely something to consider. The building depicted in the photo exists in Milan and has one awards for architecture and urban development so I’m sure its designer. Stefano Boeri, did plan for this. Its been recognized for its positive impact on the environment and urban planning. Not just trees but a wind farm and solar energy equipment are included and the even the colors and species of the trees were planned in advance. While not seemingly super “punk” it seems like a good example of solarpunk ideas in the present which make a solarpunk future seem more plausible. It becomes “greenwashing” on when these ideas are coopted and used to advertise for corporations but I don’t see any yogurt ads here so that’s not exactly what’s happening,

    • FriendBesto@lemmy.ml
      3·
      3 months ago

      It is not stupid, it is removed. Tree roots, with time, will dig through/break concrete. Unless the trees are heavily hindered from the get go. Either way it will lead to leaks unless heavily controlled since even small roots with enough time can damage the building structure if allowed. This is a well known issue and not one you want 20 stories up at this scale.

      The soil will lose nutrients, so unless everyone there how to compost constantly, then fertilisers will be needed to keep them alive, do you want that in your balcony?

      The whole notion of doing this is outright irresponsible from an architecture and lifestyle perspective outside saying, "Look it has green on it, and hoping people are stupid enough to fall for it.